The real biographer Nigel Cawthorne has thought about launching this gossip, disputed from different sides
Several months have passed since the day of Megxit and the announcement by Harry and Meghan of saying goodbye to their role as senior members of The Firm. A lot has been written about this event, which has upset the balance of the English Royal Family. Among the latest theories on the subject, one stands out as considered baseless and elaborated by Nigel Cawthorne, royal biographer.
According to the expert, the 'escape' of Meghan Markle and Harry from Corte would have been orchestrated by none other than Carlo and William following the interview, dating back to November 2019, granted by Prince Andrea, involved in the rough Epstein case, at BBC cameras. Journalists Rachel Bowie and Roberta Fiorito, also experts on the events of the British Royal Family, during one of the last episodes of the Royally Obsessed podcast, distanced themselves from these rumors.
The two women, after expressing their views on the matter, specified that Nigel Cawthorne's statements are related to the new biographer's book, a volume dedicated to Sarah Ferguson's ex-husband and the Epstein scandal.
Both Bowie and Fiorito, we repeat, stressed that they did not believe in an alleged 'direction' by Carlo and William behind the Megxit and pointed out that both the Duke of Cambridge and the Prince of Wales love Meghan and Harry very much, who they declared that the decision to leave the Royal Family was their choice.
Certainly there is that, although Nigel Cawthorne's claims have been dismantled from many sides, several wounds related to the period spent at court are still open in Meghan.
As you can read on the columns of the tabloid Express, in the documents related to the legal action taken by the former Suits star against the publisher of Mail on Sunday and Mail Online, guilty of having published without authorization a private letter from Harry's wife to Father Thomas, there is talk of abandonment by the Palace in this situation and the prohibition of speaking in its defense.
As mentioned several times, the newspapers mentioned above have always rejected any accusation by Lady Markle, which disputes the improper use of private information, the violation of copyright and that of the Data Protection Act.